Elon Musk fired several Twitter executives after completing his takeover of the company, according to people familiar with the matter, capping an unusual corporate battle and setting up one of the world’s most influential social media platforms for potentially broad change.

Musk fired chief executive Parag Agrawal and chief financial officer Ned Segal after the deal closed, the people said. Musk also fired Vijaya Gadde, Twitter’s top legal and policy executive, and Sean Edgett, general counsel. Spokespeople for Twitter didn’t comment.

Hours after those actions, Musk tweeted: “the bird is freed” in a seeming reference to Twitter, which has a blue bird as its logo.

Musk first agreed to buy Twitter in April for $44bn, then threatened to walk away from the deal, before reversing course again this month and committing to see through the acquisition. He previously indicated unhappiness with some of the top ranks at Twitter, at one point responding to a tweet from Agrawal with a poop emoji. He also used the site to mock Gadde, the top legal boss, tweeting an image overlaid with text that repeated allegations Twitter had a left-wing political bias.

READ Twitter cites UK national security law in legal letter to Musk as $44bn deal teeters

It wasn’t immediately clear who would step into the top positions left vacant by the 27 October exits. CNBC earlier reported the departures of Agrawal and Segal.

The deal, in which Twitter will again become a private company, adds to Musk’s expansive business reach, which also includes running Tesla, the world’s most valuable car company, and rocket company Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, among other endeavours. Musk, who had become Twitter’s largest individual shareholder, previously said he would pay for the acquisition mostly with cash, some contributed by co-investors, and $13bn in debt.

There were signs this week indicating that Musk was moving closer to acquiring the social-media platform by 28 October’s 5pm deadline. Banks started sending money backing the deal, The Wall Street Journal reported. Musk also has changed his Twitter bio to “Chief Twit”, showed himself walking into the San Francisco headquarters of the social media platform, and issued a statement on Twitter explaining his vision for the site to advertisers.

Closing the deal ends a months-long saga of whether Musk would or wouldn’t purchase the company. The deal also puts one of the world’s most prominent social media platforms under the control of the world’s richest person, with implications for the future of online discourse.

A self-described free-speech absolutist, Musk has pledged to limit content moderation in favour of emphasizing free speech. However, that approach risks causing conflicts with some advertisers, politicians and users who would prefer a more moderated platform.

In a message to advertisers on Twitter on 27 October, Musk said he was buying the company to “have a common digital town square, where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner.” He said Twitter “cannot become a free-for-all hellscape, where anything can be said with no consequences!”

Musk said the platform must be “warm and welcoming to all” and suggested Twitter could let people “choose your desired experience according to your preferences, just as you can choose, for example, to see movies or play video-games ranging from all ages to mature.”

Musk’s decision to go through with the Twitter takeover came two weeks before a trial in Delaware was set to begin over the stalled deal. The judge presiding over the legal clash agreed to pause the litigation, granting a request by Musk for more time to complete the takeover. The judge gave Musk until 28 October to follow through with his offer, or said she would schedule a November trial.

Musk offered in April to buy Twitter for $54.20 a share — higher than the company was valued at the time. In the months since the deal was struck, Twitter has faced efforts by Musk to abandon the deal, a whistleblower complaint in which Twitter’s former head of security accused the company of security and privacy problems, and unsuccessful talks to negotiate a lower price with Musk.

Musk’s takeover leaves big questions over the future of the platform, including how he might revamp its business model and how he might implement changes he has proposed for the way it polices content.

READ This hedge fund made 35% on its Twitter bet — now it’s shorting GameStop and AMC’s ‘absurd’ valuations

Like other social media companies, Twitter heavily relies on digital advertising and has faced headwinds in recent months due to broad economic uncertainty. It will also be saddled with billions in debt as a result of the deal, and payments on those loans will add costs for a company that has posted a loss in eight of its past 10 fiscal years.

The deal turned into a wild business drama with little precedent. Musk moved to buy Twitter in April. After signing a merger agreement, however, he accused the company of misrepresenting the prevalence of fake and spam accounts on its platform, which Twitter denied.

He formally tried to abandon the deal in July, prompting Twitter to sue him to enforce the original merger agreement. Musk countersued.

In early October, Musk suddenly abandoned his legal battle with Twitter, with little public explanation. After his reversal, he tweeted that “Buying Twitter is an accelerant to creating X, the everything app.” He previously suggested he could create a social media platform named X.com if he didn’t buy Twitter.

Eric Talley, a law professor at Columbia University, said after the most recent about face that several factors were piling up against Musk, including rulings from the court denying some of Musk’s discovery requests. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, who was overseeing the case in Delaware, had called some of his data requests “absurdly broad.”

“He has spent months with various attempts to figure out ways out of this deal,” Talley said. “All those windows had started to close and some of them closed completely.”

Musk’s specific plans for the company remain unclear. He could return Twitter to public ownership after just a few years, The Wall Street Journal previously reported.

By taking Twitter private, the billionaire entrepreneur likely can take more risks to jump-start the company’s business. “It’s going to be bumpy,” said Youssef Squali, lead internet analyst at Truist Securities. “He can take it away for a couple of years, really kind of re-engineer the whole thing,” Squali said.

Musk has suggested he wants to shift Twitter away from its advertising-heavy business model to other forms of revenue, including a greater emphasis on subscriptions. Advertising accounted for more than 90% of Twitter’s revenue in the second quarter of this year.

He said he would allow former President Donald Trump back on the platform, though Trump has said he doesn’t intend to return to it. Twitter banned Trump in the wake of the 6 January 2021, attack on the US Capitol, citing what the company called “the risk of further incitement of violence.”

“Twitter is obviously not going to be turned into some right wing nuthouse. Aiming to be as broadly inclusive as possible,” Musk said in a message that was among a trove released as part of the legal battle.

The prospect of Musk taking over Twitter, as well as the subsequent uncertainty over the deal, roiled many Twitter employees. Twitter has told employees that they will hear from Musk on 28 October, according to an internal note reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

—Erin Mulvaney contributed to this article.

Write to Alexa Corse at alexa.corse@wsj.com

This article appeared in The Wall Street Journal, a fellow Dow Jones Group title

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *